News 24 Jun. 2021
Curtis successfully defends foreign states' procedural privileges in the UK Supreme Court
News 23 Jun. 2021
Ibrahim Elsadig joins Curtis as Partner in Dubai
News 09 Aug. 2021
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle enters into association with Chevalier Law in Singapore.
Event 23 Apr. 2021
Partner Borzu Sabahi to speak on Damages, Enforcement and Annulment of Arbitral Awards at Executive Training Program hosted by the Government of India and the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade
Client Alert 13 Oct. 2021
Green Claims Code: How the UK Competition and Markets Authority is saying “enough” to corporate greenwashing
Event 21 Sep. 2021
Partner Simon Batifort Lectures on the Defense of States in Investment Arbitration at Université Paris Nanterre
News 15 Oct. 2021
Claudia Frutos-Peterson and Elisa Botero Ranked Among the Top 100 Female Lawyers in Latin America by Latinvex
News 13 Oct. 2021
Curtis Joins The Appellate Project to Promote Appellate Practice to Diverse Law Students
News 20 Sep. 2021
Curtis Successfully Defends the Sultanate of Oman and Oman Aluminium Rolling Company LLC in U.S. Department of Commerce Trade Case
News 16 Aug. 2021
Curtis Establishes Presence in Saudi Arabia
Client Alert 05 Oct. 2021
Proposed Legislative Changes to Federal Estate, Gift and Trust Taxation
Publications 22 Sep. 2021
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
U.S. Insight: Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021)
U.S. Insight: Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021)
News 24 Dec. 2010
On December 24, 2010, the Supreme Court of British Columbia issued a decision in a criminal case, Regina v. Singleton, 2010 BCSC 1855, in which the court relied, in part, upon expert testimony given by Curtis litigation partner Jacques Semmelman.
The defendant had sought dismissal of the criminal case, arguing that there had been misconduct by both the U.S. and Canadian governments during the course of his U.S. extradition proceeding. The Ministry of the Attorney General of British Columbia retained Mr. Semmelman as its expert witness on U.S. extradition law and procedure. Mr. Semmelman delivered an expert's report that rebutted the allegations of governmental misconduct, and then testified at trial as an expert witness for the prosecution.
In its decision (in which it found the defendant guilty), the Supreme Court of British Columbia described Mr. Semmelman as 'a leading expert on extradition proceedings in the United States,' and took note of his 'broad practical and academic experience.' The court quoted at length from Mr. Semmelman's expert report, and relied upon his expert opinion in concluding that there had been no governmental misconduct in the U.S. extradition proceeding.