News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
more
News 25 Jan. 2024
Counsel Mohannad A. El Murtadi Suleiman Addresses “Africanization” of International Investment Law
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
News 28 Aug. 2024
Curtis Recognized for Excellence in Arbitration in Chambers Latin America Guide 2025
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 31 Jul. 2023
Curtis Welcomes Senior Saudi Advisor, Dr. Majed Alotaibi, to its Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
news
Legal 500 UK Recognizes Curtis Practices and Attorneys in 2025 Edition
Curtis Attorneys Featured in IBA Insolvency and Arbitration Working Group’s New Reports
News 19 Feb. 2021
On February 17, 2021, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York presiding over the Aluminum Warehousing Antitrust Litigation granted the defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment dismissing all claims by seven of the ten plaintiffs, and restricting claims by an eighth. Curtis represents defendant Glencore Ltd. and certain of its affiliates.
The plaintiffs allege that Glencore Ltd., JPMorgan Chase & Co., and the Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., along with their respective warehousing affiliates, conspired to raise the price of primary aluminum between 2010 and 2016, in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. Reviewing federal cases concerning so-called “umbrella purchasers” who allege price-fixing but purchased only from non-defendant sellers, the Court held that the plaintiffs could not pursue claims as to their purchases of primary aluminum from sellers that were not alleged conspirators. Seven plaintiffs never purchased aluminum from any alleged conspirator during the relevant years, and so were dismissed from the case.
The Curtis team consists of partners Eliot Lauer and Jacques Semmelman, and associates Nathaniel Ament-Stone and Mitchell Clough.
Commercial Disputes - Litigation
New York
+1 212 696 6000
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.