News 05 Dec. 2024
Partner Dr. Alexandra G. Maier Recognized Again in Lexology Client Choice Award 2025, Mining Experts Category 2025
more
Event 23 Oct. 2024
Counsel Mohannad El Murtadi Suleiman to Speak at the 2nd Annual Africa Arbitration Day in New York
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
News 28 Aug. 2024
Curtis Recognized for Excellence in Arbitration in Chambers Latin America Guide 2025
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
News 08 Oct. 2024
Curtis Boosts London Finance and Corporate Capability with Appointment of Partner Christopher Harrison
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
podcast
Curtis Law in Buenos Aires
client alert
The EU issues new FAQs clarifying the Best Efforts Obligation on EU Operators
The U.S. antidumping duty and countervailing duty laws (AD/CVD) are administered by two separate agencies: The International Trade Commission ("ITC") investigates whether the targeted imports cause the U.S. industry to suffer material injury. The Department of Commerce ("DOC") calculates the dumping margins and subsidy margins.
Curtis' trade remedies lawyers have achieved numerous successes for clients in DOC trade remedies proceedings. In several cases, we have achieved de minimis dumping margins and countervailing duty margins, which allowed our clients to avoid the continuing burden of trade restrictive orders. In many other trade remedy cases, our clients obtained the lowest margins of the various foreign respondents participating in the investigation.
Clients benefit from our ability to undertake sophisticated quantitative analyses in-house to maximize defense efforts while controlling client costs. A team of non-lawyer specialists, including former DOC officials, continuously run simulations on client databases during the preparation of responses. This allows our lawyers to focus on developing methodologies and presentations that provide the lowest possible dumping margins and countervailing duty margins in trade remedies cases. Based on these simulations, we can advise clients what to expect from the investigation much earlier in the process, and suggest alternative approaches if the margins are commercially unacceptable.
Administrative reviews are an area in which we have particular experience. In those cases in which our clients are subject to an antidumping duty order or a countervailing duty order, we work with the client to obtain the best possible result in the annual administrative review process. We have successfully implemented administrative review strategies that allowed our clients to establish successive “zero margins” resulting in order revocations. To help our clients with antidumping review planning, we developed a proprietary software process that clients use to monitor and control effectively their ongoing dumping liabilities.
We do all of this work in-house, unlike many law firms that subcontract the heart of their trade remedy legal defense work to non-lawyer consultants and others. Our belief is that lawyers cannot adequately defend the client’s interests without being completely immersed in the facts and margin methodologies. If there are key accounting or economic issues, our lawyers grapple with them until they are mastered. This approach has allowed us to pioneer new ground in the application of the antidumping law to hyperinflationary economies, to win key battles over the allocation of research and development expenses, and to craft creative approaches to the treatment of indirect expenses.
In antidumping cases against “non-market economy” (NME) countries, such as China and Vietnam, the DOC applies special antidumping calculation rules.
The Curtis international trade team has substantial experience in defending the interests of exporters and importers in these cases.
Most recently, our lawyers have been retained to represent the interests of exporters (or foreign governments) in the following NME cases.
China• Passenger Vehicle and Light Truck Tires • Hardwood and decorative plywood • Xanthan gum• Multi-layered wood flooring• Certain coated paper• Seamless line and pressure pipe • OCTG Goods • Activated carbon • Off-the-road tires • Certain steel nails • Circular welded steel pipe • Coated free sheet paper • Steel wire rod • Diamond saw blades • Color television receivers • Wooden bedroom furniture
Vietnam• Frozen warm water shrimp • Frozen fish fillets
In addition, the Curtis international trade team includes former DOC staff who were responsible for handling a variety of antidumping cases against non-market economies.
Their case experience includes the following.
China• Sebacic acid • Pure magnesium • Auto replacement glass • Color television receivers • Persulfates • Crawfish • Natural bristle paintbrushes • Polyvinyl alcohol • Chlorinated isocyanurates • Tissue paper • Crêpe paper • Honey • Pencils • Heavy forged hand tools • Helical spring lockwashers
Kazakhstan• Hot-rolled steel
Russia• Pure magnesium • Cold-rolled steel
Daniel Porter
Partner
Matthew McCullough
James Durling
International Trade
ITC Injury Proceedings
WTO and International Trade Dispute Settlement
Washington, D.C.
+1 202 452 7373
Beijing
+86 10 8564 6200
Dubai
+971 4 382 6100
Geneva
+41 22 718 3500
New York
+1 212 696 6000
"Highly experienced and creative attorneys who are able to zero in on key arguments and not waste resources on lesser issues."
Chambers USA 2022 - International Trade: Trade Remedies & Trade Policy
"Deep knowledge of trade regulations and sanction programs. Excellent service irrespective of the size of the client."
Legal 500: USA 2022 International Trade
Among the few top law firms representing foreign producer and importer interests in trade regulatory cases.
Chambers Global International Trade/WTO
"The team is well organized, quick to respond and is timely in decision making."
Chambers USA 2021 - International Trade - USA Nationwide
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.