Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 09 Sep. 2022
France’s Cour de Cassation Confirms Set Aside of EUR 452 Million Award Previously Issued Against Libya
Client Alert 20 Sep. 2022
Unexpected Events from Covid to Supply Chain Disruption: Implications for US Contract, Securities and Antitrust Law
Client Alert 29 Jun. 2022
Discovery, Jurisdiction and Service: Changes in U.S. Law and Implications for Japanese Companies
News 28 Sep. 2022
Simon Batifort Quoted by GAR on Proposed Regulations of Third-Party Funding in Europe
Client Alert 27 Sep. 2022
UNCITRAL Working Group III: An Update on Certain Key Issues in ISDS Reform
News 23 Sep. 2022
Curtis Recognized by Latin Lawyer 250 (2023)
Event 22 Sep. 2022
Dori Yoldi Speaks to AbogadasMX on Practicing Law Abroad
News 27 Sep. 2022
Curtis Boosts Riyadh Office with New Corporate Partner Stuart Davies
News 16 Aug. 2022
Curtis Delivers More Firsts for the Government of Oman in its Defense Against U.S. Trade Measures
News 30 Sep. 2022
Jason Wright Wins Small Company Turnaround/Transaction Award at TMA Annual Conference
News 21 Sep. 2022
U.S. Department of State Presents Fulbright Specialist Award to Charles Howland for Project in Uzbekistan
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 20 Jul. 2022
The EU Undertakes Fundamental Reform of the Legal Basis for Sanctions Enforcement
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
News 21 Jun. 2021
On June 17, 2021 the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled in favor of the Spanish olive industry in a multi-year dispute over U.S. Department of Commerce findings that the Spanish olive industry is unfairly subsidized. This was the second court victory for ASOCIACIÓN DE EXPORTADORES E INDUSTRIALES DE ACEITUNAS DE MESA and its member companies, and a Curtis team led by International Trade Partner Matthew McCullough, in the matter.
The Court again held unlawful the Commerce Department’s interpretation of key statutory provisions, including those related to the de jure specificity of subsidies and Commerce authority to presume that subsidies received by producers of raw agricultural products are “passed through” to processors of those raw products. Both issues are matters of first impression before the court. The Commerce Department has 90 days to respond to the court’s opinion. The new ruling sets up the possibility of termination of the CVD order on ripe olives from Spain in what would be a major victory for the Spanish industry and European agriculture interests.
Why is this case important?
Commerce’s subsidy “pass through” finding related to raw agricultural products, left unchecked, could be employed against other European agricultural exports, jeopardizing trade in that sector.
Similarly, Commerce’s broad de jure specificity finding would also leave agriculture assistance programs in Europe vulnerable if not successfully challenged. The European Commission, recognizing the significance of the Commerce action, is litigating similar issues at the World Trade Organization in relation to the olives case.
The case is ASEMESA et al. v. UNITED STATES, Court No. 18-00195, Slip. Op. 21-76 (June 17, 2021).
Trade Remedy Practice
+1 202 452 7373
+41 22 718 3500
Event 29 Sep. 2022
Claudia Frutos-Peterson Speaks on the Auxiliary Role of Judges During Arbitral Proceedings