Event 14 Oct. 2022
Curtis Provides Capacity Training to the Government of Uganda
Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 15 May. 2023
Curtis represents e-commerce retailer in its fight to recover monies withheld by PayPal, the global payment giant
News 16 Dec. 2022
Curtis Trade Team is top ranked in Chambers Asia-Pacific 2023
Event 08 May. 2023
Partner Irene Petrelli to Participate in ICC YAAF Event
News 02 May. 2023
Curtis Italy with DeA Capital in the Acquisition of Magic S.r.l
Event 23 May. 2023
Partners Luciana Ricart and Fernando Tupa Will Teach a Workshop on Hearings in Investment Arbitration for Arbanza School of Arbitration’s Online Program
Publications 23 Feb. 2023
Fernando Tupa Publishes Book on Forum-Specific Consent to International Arbitration in Investment Agreements
Event 03 May. 2023
Dr. Borzu Sabahi to Speak at ICSID-ADGM Joint Conference: Investment Protection and Armed Conflict
Event 19 Mar. 2023
Sebastiano Nessi speaks at Bahrain Business and Legal Landscape Conference
Event 01 Jun. 2023
Curtis Environmental Chair Charles Howland to Moderate Panel Discussion on Latest Developments in Environmental Due Diligence at ABA Masterclass on Environmental Transactions
News 25 May. 2023
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Distinguished Law Professors in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Case
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 27 Jan. 2021
The alert is available for download with footnotes here.
On January 1, 2021, Congress enacted the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (the “AML Act”). Part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the AML Act creates a broad range of new anti-money laundering obligations for banks, other financial institutions, and certain private investment structures, and expands the extra-territorial reach of U.S. regulators. More than 85 pages long, the AML Act contains a number of significant new provisions and changes to prior law. Although many of the new provisions, including those creating a federal beneficial ownership registry, call for implementing regulations that will have to be promulgated, other provisions, including new criminal offenses and new subpoena authority over foreign banks with U.S. correspondent accounts, take effect immediately. This alert will discuss the new subpoena power over foreign banks, and the new enforcement standards.
Subpoena Power Over Foreign Banks Records
Section 6308 of the AML Act permits the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) to subpoena foreign bank records if the foreign bank maintains a U.S. correspondent account, and to request “any records relating to the correspondent account or any account at the foreign bank,” including records maintained outside of the United States. This is the most significant amendment of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and related anti-money laundering laws since 2001.
The new authority may be exercised in any investigation of a violation of federal criminal law, in any civil asset forfeiture proceeding, and in any investigation conducted under the BSA and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. This is regardless of whether the correspondent account was used in connection with the potential violation of U.S. law. The subpoena power is no longer limited to records related to the correspondent account, a limitation that existed previously. Rather, the subpoena can request records related to any account at the foreign bank, including records maintained outside of the United States. A non-U.S. bank may petition the appropriate U.S. district court to modify or quash the subpoena on specified grounds. The AML Act, however, prohibits courts from quashing or modifying a subpoena solely on the ground that compliance would conflict with foreign bank secrecy or confidentiality laws.
Failure to comply with a subpoena could result in termination of correspondent privileges, as well as fines and penalties for noncompliance. Foreign banks may be liable for a civil penalty up to $50,000 for each day that they fail to comply with a subpoena, and there may be additional penalties if the foreign bank fails to comply for more than 60 days. Furthermore, the Treasury and the DOJ may require U.S. financial institutions to terminate correspondent relationships with a foreign bank that fails to comply with a subpoena.
Section 6308’s expansion of the subpoena power strengthens the ability of the Treasury and the DOJ to conduct investigations involving foreign banks and to pursue enforcement actions, as they will now have an easier path to the access and use of documents that previously were difficult to obtain.
New Enforcement Standards
The AML Act also includes other provisions that may affect the investigation and enforcement of potential BSA violations. For instance, the AML Act:
The AML Act is the most significant overhaul of U.S. AML laws in decades. It has significant implications for foreign banks that maintain correspondent bank accounts at financial institutions in the United States. Financial institutions should review and understand the expanded subpoena powers and other changes wrought by the AML Act, to ensure that they are adequately prepared for the changes. The AML Act will affect many aspects of how financial institutions interact with regulators, enforcement agencies, other financial institutions, and account holders, and how they comply with U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Attorneys at Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt Mosle LLP are fully equipped and prepared to advise clients on these provisions, and to make sure they are prepared for their implementation.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Commercial Disputes - Litigation
White Collar Defense and Investigations
Antitrust and Competition
Commercial Disputes - Arbitration
Jonathan J. Walsh
+1 212 696 6000
+41 22 718 3500
Event 30 May. 2023
Partner Antonio M. Prida to speak at 31st World Forum of Mediation Centres of UIA