Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 09 Sep. 2022
France’s Cour de Cassation Confirms Set Aside of EUR 452 Million Award Previously Issued Against Libya
Client Alert 20 Sep. 2022
Unexpected Events from Covid to Supply Chain Disruption: Implications for US Contract, Securities and Antitrust Law
Client Alert 29 Jun. 2022
Discovery, Jurisdiction and Service: Changes in U.S. Law and Implications for Japanese Companies
News 26 Sep. 2022
Curtis Italy wins International Arbitration - Energy Award at Legal Community Litigation Awards 2022
Article 21 Sep. 2022
E-Commerce Laws in Europe Shape the Future of Fashion
News 23 Sep. 2022
Curtis Recognized by Latin Lawyer 250 (2023)
Event 22 Sep. 2022
Dori Yoldi Speaks to AbogadasMX on Practicing Law Abroad
News 16 Aug. 2022
Curtis Delivers More Firsts for the Government of Oman in its Defense Against U.S. Trade Measures
Event 14 Jun. 2022
Antonia Birt to Speak on Importance of Going Paperless in Arbitration Proceedings at Upcoming Webinar
News 21 Sep. 2022
U.S. Department of State Presents Fulbright Specialist Award to Charles Howland for Project in Uzbekistan
Event 20 Sep. 2022
Susan Maples and Andrew Larkin Speak at the Biennial Conference of ASIL’s International Economic Law Interest Group
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 20 Jul. 2022
The EU Undertakes Fundamental Reform of the Legal Basis for Sanctions Enforcement
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 27 Jan. 2021
The alert is available for download with footnotes here.
On January 1, 2021, Congress enacted the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (the “AML Act”). Part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, the AML Act creates a broad range of new anti-money laundering obligations for banks, other financial institutions, and certain private investment structures, and expands the extra-territorial reach of U.S. regulators. More than 85 pages long, the AML Act contains a number of significant new provisions and changes to prior law. Although many of the new provisions, including those creating a federal beneficial ownership registry, call for implementing regulations that will have to be promulgated, other provisions, including new criminal offenses and new subpoena authority over foreign banks with U.S. correspondent accounts, take effect immediately. This alert will discuss the new subpoena power over foreign banks, and the new enforcement standards.
Subpoena Power Over Foreign Banks Records
Section 6308 of the AML Act permits the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the U.S. Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) to subpoena foreign bank records if the foreign bank maintains a U.S. correspondent account, and to request “any records relating to the correspondent account or any account at the foreign bank,” including records maintained outside of the United States. This is the most significant amendment of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and related anti-money laundering laws since 2001.
The new authority may be exercised in any investigation of a violation of federal criminal law, in any civil asset forfeiture proceeding, and in any investigation conducted under the BSA and anti-money laundering laws and regulations. This is regardless of whether the correspondent account was used in connection with the potential violation of U.S. law. The subpoena power is no longer limited to records related to the correspondent account, a limitation that existed previously. Rather, the subpoena can request records related to any account at the foreign bank, including records maintained outside of the United States. A non-U.S. bank may petition the appropriate U.S. district court to modify or quash the subpoena on specified grounds. The AML Act, however, prohibits courts from quashing or modifying a subpoena solely on the ground that compliance would conflict with foreign bank secrecy or confidentiality laws.
Failure to comply with a subpoena could result in termination of correspondent privileges, as well as fines and penalties for noncompliance. Foreign banks may be liable for a civil penalty up to $50,000 for each day that they fail to comply with a subpoena, and there may be additional penalties if the foreign bank fails to comply for more than 60 days. Furthermore, the Treasury and the DOJ may require U.S. financial institutions to terminate correspondent relationships with a foreign bank that fails to comply with a subpoena.
Section 6308’s expansion of the subpoena power strengthens the ability of the Treasury and the DOJ to conduct investigations involving foreign banks and to pursue enforcement actions, as they will now have an easier path to the access and use of documents that previously were difficult to obtain.
New Enforcement Standards
The AML Act also includes other provisions that may affect the investigation and enforcement of potential BSA violations. For instance, the AML Act:
The AML Act is the most significant overhaul of U.S. AML laws in decades. It has significant implications for foreign banks that maintain correspondent bank accounts at financial institutions in the United States. Financial institutions should review and understand the expanded subpoena powers and other changes wrought by the AML Act, to ensure that they are adequately prepared for the changes. The AML Act will affect many aspects of how financial institutions interact with regulators, enforcement agencies, other financial institutions, and account holders, and how they comply with U.S. anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Attorneys at Curtis Mallet-Prevost Colt Mosle LLP are fully equipped and prepared to advise clients on these provisions, and to make sure they are prepared for their implementation.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Commercial Disputes - Litigation
White Collar Defense and Investigations
Antitrust and Competition
Commercial Disputes - Arbitration
Jonathan J. Walsh
+1 212 696 6000
+41 22 718 3500