News 24 Jun. 2021
Curtis successfully defends foreign states' procedural privileges in the UK Supreme Court
News 23 Jun. 2021
Ibrahim Elsadig joins Curtis as Partner in Dubai
Client Alert 24 Feb. 2022
EU, UK, Japan and Australia Impose Sanctions on Russia
News 09 Aug. 2021
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle enters into association with Chevalier Law in Singapore.
News 06 May. 2022
Curtis Advises Terna Group on the Sale of its Latin America Power Transmission Assets to CDPQ
Publications 05 May. 2022
Marie-Claire Argac, Simon Batifort, and Cyprien Mathié share highlights from “Affaires d’Etats: Practical Considerations When Defending States in International Arbitration” on Kluwer Arbitration Blog
Event 26 Apr. 2022
Claudia Frutos-Peterson Speaks at CAI Costa Rica’s 13th Congress of International Arbitration
News 21 Apr. 2022
SCOTUS Upholds U.S. Colonialism under the U.S. Constitution
Client Alert 23 Mar. 2022
The Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) has launched the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022
Event 22 Nov. 2021
Partner Antonia Birt spoke at ADGMAC and AIAC Webinar Series: Webinar 5 - Disputes in Fintech and Complex Technology in MESEA
News 16 May. 2022
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Ohio Justice & Policy Center in Prisoners’ Rights Case
News 10 May. 2022
Juan Perla’s Argument in D.C. Circuit Featured on Audio Arguendo Podcast
Client Alert 21 Apr. 2022
New Laws Targeting Assets of Russian Oligarchs: The U.S. Announces Task Force KleptoCapture and the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Rewards Program
Client Alert 19 Apr. 2022
U.S. President Biden Expands Export Controls Imposed on Russia and Belarus
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 30 Apr. 2020
The alert is available for download HERE.
The widespread coronavirus has largely slowed economic activity across the globe. As many businesses weigh their options to navigate through this economic downturn, the prospect of bankruptcy protection rapidly becomes a consideration. In order to counteract the secondary economic effects of COVID-19, the federal government passed the CARES Act (the “Act”) to bridge the gap for companies teetering on the edge of insolvency. Notably, the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) assumed the role of providing loans to qualifying companies pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP Loans”).
PPP Loan Qualifications Tightened by SBA
On April 24, 2020, the SBA tightened the qualifications required to obtain approval for PPP Loans by releasing an interim rule that clarified: “[i]f the applicant or the owner of the applicant is the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, either at the time it submits the application or at any time before the loan is disbursed, the applicant is ineligible to receive a PPP loan.”
Thus, it appears that the U.S. government is definitively not providing PPP Loan assistance to chapter 11 debtors. Further, the rule states, “[i]f the applicant or the owner of the applicant becomes the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding after submitting a PPP application but before the loan is disbursed, it is the applicant’s obligation to notify the lender and request cancellation of the application.” This solidifies the notion that the SBA does not support loans to chapter 11 debtors.
The bar on companies already involved in chapter 11 may uproot their plans to weather this economic downturn. For example, Hidalgo County Emergency Service Foundation, an emergency medical services company based in southern Texas that filed for chapter 11 protection on October 8, 2019 (“Hidalgo”) (Case No. 19-20497 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)), is relying on PPP Loan funding in order to continue paying its employees and running its business; a common struggle many U.S. companies are facing during the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting adverse effect on the economy. The security that this loan offers is under threat by the SBA. In response, Hidalgo and others retaliated.
Chapter 11 Debtors Challenge the SBA
Hidalgo recently obtained a temporary restraining order against the SBA. This effectively nullified the language on the PPP Loan application asking “[i]s the Applicant or any owner of the Applicant . . . presently involved in any bankruptcy?” Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court’s order, Hidalgo was given a second opportunity to apply for and procure the PPP Loan. In an analogous case, on April 28, 2020, Cosi, Inc. filed a motion for a temporary restraining order requesting, among other things, an injunction against the SBA following its denial of relief under the Act. An expedited hearing is set to be heard in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on April 30, 2020. Similarly, Ravn Air Group Inc., an Alaskan airline that filed for chapter 11 protection on April 5, 2020, structured much of its plan of reorganization around obtaining debtor-in-possession financing pursuant to the Act, but was denied the loan and filed a chapter 11 plan of liquidation on April 27, 2020.
The future remains uncertain for chapter 11 debtors, but the SBA’s recent bankruptcy bar highlights the importance of hiring professional and knowledgeable bankruptcy lawyers to best navigate companies, such as Hidalgo, Cosi and Ravn Air Group, through insolvency both in and out of chapter 11.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Restructuring and Insolvency
+1 212 696 6000