News 11 Oct. 2023
Curtis Team Instrumental in Shareholder Approval of a New Multilateral Treaty to Transform Pan-African Housing Finance Institution Shelter Afrique into a Development Bank
Event 23 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at the 52nd IDRI Professional Accreditation & Membership Programme
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
Article 22 Aug. 2023
Fuad Zarbiyev Publishes Article in Journal of International Economic Law
Client Alert 14 Aug. 2023
The EU’s Market in Crypto Assets (MiCA) Regulation: The Highlights
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
Event 11 Jul. 2023
Partner Elisa Botero Speaks on the Role of the ICC in Investment Disputes
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 31 Jul. 2023
Curtis Welcomes Senior Saudi Advisor, Dr. Majed Alotaibi, to its Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 30 Apr. 2020
The alert is available for download HERE.
The widespread coronavirus has largely slowed economic activity across the globe. As many businesses weigh their options to navigate through this economic downturn, the prospect of bankruptcy protection rapidly becomes a consideration. In order to counteract the secondary economic effects of COVID-19, the federal government passed the CARES Act (the “Act”) to bridge the gap for companies teetering on the edge of insolvency. Notably, the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) assumed the role of providing loans to qualifying companies pursuant to the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP Loans”).
PPP Loan Qualifications Tightened by SBA
On April 24, 2020, the SBA tightened the qualifications required to obtain approval for PPP Loans by releasing an interim rule that clarified: “[i]f the applicant or the owner of the applicant is the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, either at the time it submits the application or at any time before the loan is disbursed, the applicant is ineligible to receive a PPP loan.”
Thus, it appears that the U.S. government is definitively not providing PPP Loan assistance to chapter 11 debtors. Further, the rule states, “[i]f the applicant or the owner of the applicant becomes the debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding after submitting a PPP application but before the loan is disbursed, it is the applicant’s obligation to notify the lender and request cancellation of the application.” This solidifies the notion that the SBA does not support loans to chapter 11 debtors.
The bar on companies already involved in chapter 11 may uproot their plans to weather this economic downturn. For example, Hidalgo County Emergency Service Foundation, an emergency medical services company based in southern Texas that filed for chapter 11 protection on October 8, 2019 (“Hidalgo”) (Case No. 19-20497 (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)), is relying on PPP Loan funding in order to continue paying its employees and running its business; a common struggle many U.S. companies are facing during the coronavirus pandemic and the resulting adverse effect on the economy. The security that this loan offers is under threat by the SBA. In response, Hidalgo and others retaliated.
Chapter 11 Debtors Challenge the SBA
Hidalgo recently obtained a temporary restraining order against the SBA. This effectively nullified the language on the PPP Loan application asking “[i]s the Applicant or any owner of the Applicant . . . presently involved in any bankruptcy?” Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Court’s order, Hidalgo was given a second opportunity to apply for and procure the PPP Loan. In an analogous case, on April 28, 2020, Cosi, Inc. filed a motion for a temporary restraining order requesting, among other things, an injunction against the SBA following its denial of relief under the Act. An expedited hearing is set to be heard in the Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on April 30, 2020. Similarly, Ravn Air Group Inc., an Alaskan airline that filed for chapter 11 protection on April 5, 2020, structured much of its plan of reorganization around obtaining debtor-in-possession financing pursuant to the Act, but was denied the loan and filed a chapter 11 plan of liquidation on April 27, 2020.
The future remains uncertain for chapter 11 debtors, but the SBA’s recent bankruptcy bar highlights the importance of hiring professional and knowledgeable bankruptcy lawyers to best navigate companies, such as Hidalgo, Cosi and Ravn Air Group, through insolvency both in and out of chapter 11.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Restructuring and Insolvency
+1 212 696 6000