Event 23 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at the 52nd IDRI Professional Accreditation & Membership Programme
more
Event 14 Oct. 2022
Curtis Provides Capacity Training to the Government of Uganda
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
Article 22 Aug. 2023
Fuad Zarbiyev Publishes Article in Journal of International Economic Law
Client Alert 14 Aug. 2023
The EU’s Market in Crypto Assets (MiCA) Regulation: The Highlights
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
Event 11 Jul. 2023
Partner Elisa Botero Speaks on the Role of the ICC in Investment Disputes
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 31 Jul. 2023
Curtis Welcomes Senior Saudi Advisor, Dr. Majed Alotaibi, to its Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
News 27 Mar. 2013
On March 21, 2013, Curtis obtained a dismissal of an appeal filed by the City of New York to the New York State Court of Appeals on a previously granted Article 78 Petition. The original Article 78 was filed by Valentina Morales and, then Curtis associate, Morgan Nighan on behalf of an inmate mother at Rikers Island, Arisleida Duarte, who had been denied admission to the prison's nursery program based on her criminal history and the charges of gang assault then pending against her. Arguing that the law governing the nursery program, NYS Corrections Law Section 611, did not permit the New York City Department of Corrections to deny admission based on automatic disqualifiers, Curtis won at both the Supreme Court and the Appellate Division, Second Department. In its motion for leave to appeal to the New York State Court of Appeals, the City asserted that the Appellate Division had erred both in finding that the sole criterion for admission to the nursery program under the statute was the 'best interests of the child' and in ordering that Ms. Duarte be admitted to the nursery program. Two days prior to the scheduled argument the Department of Corrections reissued its administrative guidelines and, among other procedural changes, removed any and all automatic disqualifiers to admission. Ms. Morales in part then argued to the Court of Appeals that the case should be dismissed as moot as no exception to the mootness doctrine could be applied especially in light of the new administrative guidelines. The Court of Appeals agreed and in a decision dated March 21, 2013 dismissed the City's appeal.
The Curtis team consisted of Valentina Morales, Turner Smith and George Spencer.
Turner P. Smith
Partner
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.