News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
more
News 25 Jan. 2024
Counsel Mohannad A. El Murtadi Suleiman Addresses “Africanization” of International Investment Law
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
News 28 Aug. 2024
Curtis Recognized for Excellence in Arbitration in Chambers Latin America Guide 2025
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 31 Jul. 2023
Curtis Welcomes Senior Saudi Advisor, Dr. Majed Alotaibi, to its Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
article
International Corporate Rescue Publishes Article by Partner Emanuella Agostinelli
event
Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Co-chair the Review Committee of the IACAC Arbitration Rules
News 28 Oct. 2014
Curtis successfully represented Chemgene Holding ApS, a Danish drug discovery company, and its founder and CEO, Dr. Henrik Pedersen, in a dispute over the ownership and inventorship of a group of U.S. patents and patent applications that was initiated by another Danish drug discovery company, Nuevolution A/S, and the inventor of the patents-at-issue, Dr. Peter Birk Rasmussen.
Curtis won a forum non conveniens dismissal of the complaint, which the plaintiffs filed in the Eastern District of Virginia more than a year and a half after plaintiff Nuevolution asserted identical claims in a parallel proceeding before the Danish Maritime and Commercial High Court. A federal judge in the Eastern District of Virginia rejected the plaintiffs' contention its claim to correct the inventorship of a U.S. patent under 35 U.S.C. § 256 could only be decided by a U.S. court and therefore precluded a forum non conveniens dismissal. Instead, the court agreed with defendants that the resolution of the inventorship and ownership of priority Danish patents in the parallel proceedings in Denmark would ultimately resolve the inventorship and ownership of the related U.S. patents-at-issue and therefore Denmark was the more appropriate and convenient forum.
The Curtis team was led by partner Turner Smith and included associate Kevin Meehan and counsel Eric Stenshoel.
Intellectual Property Law
Turner P. Smith
Partner
Kevin A. Meehan
Eric Stenshoel
Counsel
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.