News 24 Jun. 2021
Curtis successfully defends foreign states' procedural privileges in the UK Supreme Court
News 23 Jun. 2021
Ibrahim Elsadig joins Curtis as Partner in Dubai
Client Alert 24 Feb. 2022
EU, UK, Japan and Australia Impose Sanctions on Russia
News 09 Aug. 2021
Curtis, Mallet-Prevost, Colt & Mosle enters into association with Chevalier Law in Singapore.
News 06 May. 2022
Curtis Advises Terna Group on the Sale of its Latin America Power Transmission Assets to CDPQ
Publications 05 May. 2022
Marie-Claire Argac, Simon Batifort, and Cyprien Mathié share highlights from “Affaires d’Etats: Practical Considerations When Defending States in International Arbitration” on Kluwer Arbitration Blog
Event 26 Apr. 2022
Claudia Frutos-Peterson Speaks at CAI Costa Rica’s 13th Congress of International Arbitration
News 21 Apr. 2022
SCOTUS Upholds U.S. Colonialism under the U.S. Constitution
Client Alert 23 Mar. 2022
The Dubai International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) has launched the DIAC Arbitration Rules 2022
Event 22 Nov. 2021
Partner Antonia Birt spoke at ADGMAC and AIAC Webinar Series: Webinar 5 - Disputes in Fintech and Complex Technology in MESEA
News 16 May. 2022
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Ohio Justice & Policy Center in Prisoners’ Rights Case
News 10 May. 2022
Juan Perla’s Argument in D.C. Circuit Featured on Audio Arguendo Podcast
Client Alert 21 Apr. 2022
New Laws Targeting Assets of Russian Oligarchs: The U.S. Announces Task Force KleptoCapture and the Kleptocracy Asset Recovery Rewards Program
Client Alert 19 Apr. 2022
U.S. President Biden Expands Export Controls Imposed on Russia and Belarus
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
News 27 Apr. 2016
Funds Partner Marc V. Kramer and Frankfurt office funds associate Agata Zdunek were quoted extensively by Institutional Money, a leading publication for institutional investors in the D-A-CH region (Germany-Austria-Switzerland), in an article titled “Hunt for Index Huggers” published very recently in edition 1/2016.
Active Share is a measure of the percentage of stock holdings in a fund manager's portfolio that differ from the fund’s benchmark index and can be useful in identifying so called "closet indexers" (“index huggers”), i.e. managers who claim to be active but whose portfolios are very similar to the benchmark portfolio. Identifying closet indexers is important because active management fees can be a significant hurdle to outperforming the index for anyone holding a portfolio similar to its benchmark.
With ESMA, the EU’s Securities and Markets Authority, steadily increasing its supervisory work on potential closet index tracking and German securities regulator BaFin even going beyond ESMA by recently launching special inspections with mutual fund managers in Germany, Mr Kramer describes possible legal consequences from detected closet indexing such as, inter alia, administrative fines by BaFin and prospectus liability towards investors.
Marc Kramer points out, “Regulators in the EU and in Germany have started to define Active Share and to determine criteria for identifying closet indexing with no indications available yet of what the outcome will be.” he notes that fund managers in Germany appear pretty aware by now and finally have put Active Share on top of their internal agendas. He further comments: “Interestingly, in Europe - primarily in the Nordic countries and in Poland but now also in Germany - closet indexing seems to be a bigger issue than in the United States”. According to Mrs Zdunek, any deviation from the investment program and strategy described in the prospectus of a mutual fund may make its manager vulnerable as to closet indexing.
Marc V. Kramer
Agata J. Zdunek