News 09 Apr. 2024
Curtis Announces New Partners and Counsels Across Offices in Spring 2024
more
News 25 Jan. 2024
Counsel Mohannad A. El Murtadi Suleiman Addresses “Africanization” of International Investment Law
Event 18 Aug. 2023
Partner Borzu Sabahi Speaks at FDI Moot Shenzhen
News 25 Jul. 2023
Partner Eric Gilioli Ranked in Top 10 Influential Energy & Natural Resources Lawyers in Kazakhstan in Business Today
Client Alert 28 Dec. 2023
U.S. to Impose Secondary Sanctions on Non-U.S. Banks For Financing Russia’s Defense Industry
News 28 Aug. 2024
Curtis Recognized for Excellence in Arbitration in Chambers Latin America Guide 2025
Event 22 Aug. 2023
Partner Dr. Claudia Frutos-Peterson to Speak at Arbitration and ADR Commission of the ICC Mexico
News 15 Aug. 2023
Legal Reader Publishes Article on Dr. Majed Alotaibi’s Arrival as Senior Counsel in Curtis’ Riyadh Office
News 31 Jul. 2023
Curtis Welcomes Senior Saudi Advisor, Dr. Majed Alotaibi, to its Riyadh Office
News 24 Aug. 2023
Curtis Attorneys Quoted in CoinDesk on FTX Founder Sam Bankman-Fried’s Strategy Ahead of His Criminal Trial
Client Alert 10 Jul. 2024
EU Adopts New Restrictive Measures Against Belarus
Client Alert 26 Jun. 2024
The EU Adopts its 14th Sanctions Package Against Russia
news
Legal 500 UK Recognizes Curtis Practices and Attorneys in 2025 Edition
Curtis Attorneys Featured in IBA Insolvency and Arbitration Working Group’s New Reports
Client Alert 17 Jun. 2022
The full alert is available for download with footnotes here.
On June 15, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Golan v. Saada, a case concerning the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (“Hague Abduction Convention”). The unanimous opinion was authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor and broadens the discretion of federal trial courts in deciding whether children must be returned to their home countries in certain international custody disputes.
Adopted in 1980, the Hague Abduction Convention is an international agreement that addresses international parental child abduction and provides a process for parents seeking return of a child to their home country. The Hague Abduction Convention requires contracting States to return a child when they have been wrongfully taken from their country of residence. A purpose of the Hague Abduction Convention process is to preserve the status quo that existed before the wrongful removal, while deterring parents from forum-shopping for custody disputes.
However, the Hague Abduction Convention contains an important exception to the return requirement in cases where there is a “grave risk” that returning the child to their country of residence would result in exposure to physical or psychological harm. The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Golan v. Saada provides that in cases where a court finds that there is such a grave risk, the court is not obligated to consider whether there are any ways to reduce that risk so that the child may be returned to the home country.
The dispute in Golan v. Saada was between Narkis Golan, a U.S. citizen, and Isacco Saada, an Italian citizen. In 2016, Golan gave birth to the couple’s son, known as B.A.S., in Italy and the family continued to reside there. Saada was physically abusive to Golan throughout their relationship. After travelling with the child to the U.S. to attend a wedding, Golan and the child did not return to Italy. Saada petitioned a U.S. federal district court to mandate the return of the child under the Hague Abduction Convention.
The district court found that there was a grave risk of psychological harm to B.A.S. if he were returned to Italy. However, the law of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit required the district court to consider ways to reduce that risk such that the child could still be returned to Italy. The district court therefore ordered B.A.S. to be returned to Italy with protective measures, including supervised visitation, therapy, and parenting classes. The 2nd Circuit upheld the order returning B.A.S. to Italy.
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the 2nd Circuit’s requirement that courts must always consider measures to reduce the risk of grave harm to be “inconsistent with the text and other express requirements of the Hague Convention.” Justice Sotomayor explained that the Hague Abduction Convention neither prohibits nor requires the consideration of measures to reduce that risk, leaving this to the discretion of the court deciding the case.
Curtis continues to monitor developments in cases applying the Hague Abduction Convention. Curtis attorneys have experience litigating cases under the Hague Abduction Convention and have succeeded in preventing the return of children to home countries where they would face danger. In addition to advising and litigating under the Hague Abduction Convention, Curtis has experience handling disputes involving public international law and international human rights law.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Public International Law
Commercial Disputes - Litigation
Jason D. Wright
Partner
Marija S. Ozolins
Associate
New York
+1 212 696 6000
Washington, D.C.
+1 202 452 7373
event
Fernando Tupa to Speak on Indirect Expropriation at Investment Arbitration Seminar organized by the Instituto Peruano de Arbitraje
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.