Event 14 Oct. 2022
Curtis Provides Capacity Training to the Government of Uganda
Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 15 May. 2023
Curtis represents e-commerce retailer in its fight to recover monies withheld by PayPal, the global payment giant
News 16 Dec. 2022
Curtis Trade Team is top ranked in Chambers Asia-Pacific 2023
Event 08 May. 2023
Partner Irene Petrelli to Participate in ICC YAAF Event
News 02 May. 2023
Curtis Italy with DeA Capital in the Acquisition of Magic S.r.l
Event 23 May. 2023
Partners Luciana Ricart and Fernando Tupa Will Teach a Workshop on Hearings in Investment Arbitration for Arbanza School of Arbitration’s Online Program
Publications 23 Feb. 2023
Fernando Tupa Publishes Book on Forum-Specific Consent to International Arbitration in Investment Agreements
Event 03 May. 2023
Dr. Borzu Sabahi to Speak at ICSID-ADGM Joint Conference: Investment Protection and Armed Conflict
Event 19 Mar. 2023
Sebastiano Nessi speaks at Bahrain Business and Legal Landscape Conference
Event 01 Jun. 2023
Curtis Environmental Chair Charles Howland to Moderate Panel Discussion on Latest Developments in Environmental Due Diligence at ABA Masterclass on Environmental Transactions
News 25 May. 2023
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Distinguished Law Professors in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Case
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 01 Mar. 2023
The full article is available here.
A brief overview of the
national regulation on agency contracts, firstly to highlight the key aspects
of this sector and, secondly, to point out the peculiarities of these matters,
which often represent threats for principals.
The agency contract
represents one of the most important tools for entrepreneurs who seek to create
their own product promotion network. This tool is particularly relevant within
the fashion industry and it is used, among others, by new fashion and luxury
companies which need a channel to promote their brands.
Therefore, first of all, it
is of particular interest to offer a brief overview of the national legislation
on agency contracts, highlighting the fundamental aspects of the sector;
secondly, it will be useful to point out the peculiarities of these contracts,
which often represent threats for principals.
Within the Italian national legal system, the agency contract is regulated by article 1742 and subsequent articles of the Italian Civil Code. In particular, the agency contract is an agreement whereby the entrepreneur appoints an agent to facilitate, on an ongoing basis, the conclusion of contracts for the marketing of its products within a specified territorial area.The activity of the agent – who is also qualified as an entrepreneur as it bears the economic risk of its activity – consists in finding new customers and businesses for the entrepreneur by transmitting to the principal the orders it collects within a given geographical area.As remuneration for the activity performed, the agent is entitled to receive a commission, which is a fee proportional to the number and amount of businesses and transactions concluded on behalf of the principal.The agency contract represents a typical contract for continuous or periodic performance, which can be concluded for a fixed term or indefinite term, with or without exclusivity. Upon termination of the relationship, the agent may be entitled to receive an equitable indemnity calculated pursuant to the conditions provided for by article 1751 of the Italian Civil Code. This indemnity is not due when the termination of the contract is caused by an agent’s default or is a consequence of the agent’s withdrawal or when the agent assigns to a third party the rights under the agency contract.
Among the various tools available in the market for the distribution and sale of fashion products, agency contracts are of particular importance. In fact, they are among the main channels of distribution and marketing of products in the fashion industry.
The agency contract, in fact, presents clear advantages for the entrepreneur, as it allows the fashion company:
However, as a counterbalance to the above, the agency contract imposes onerous constraints on the principal both in terms of limited means to “exit” the relationship and in terms of compensation due to the agent. The agency contract, in fact, is subject to a specific and peculiar regulation in our legal system aimed to protect the position of the agent, making it burdensome for the principal to withdraw from the contractual relationship.
Given the specific market sector under analysis, the critical issues that fashion companies, especially in the initial phase of their businesses, should cautiously consider when they intend to enter into an agency relationship are highlighted below. As mentioned above, these critical issues arise when the fashion company wants to terminate the agency relationship.
Upon termination of the agency relationship – except when the termination is the result of an agent’s default, is a consequence of the agent’s withdrawal or when the agent assigns to a third party the rights under the agency contract – the agent is entitled to receive indemnities, as long as the following conditions are met:
Indemnities cannot exceed an amount equal to a year of commissions, calculated by taking the average of the commissions received during the previous five years (or for how many years commissions have been paid, if less than five).
Firstly, the agent loses the right to receive indemnities when the principal terminates the contract as a result of a default attributable to the agent, which, because of its seriousness, does not allow a continuation of the relationship, even on a temporary basis.
Therefore, in order to exclude the right to receive indemnities, it is not sufficient for the agent’s default to be of “slight importance”, but instead it should be of such seriousness that the contract can no longer continue in any way.
Secondly, the agent loses the right to receive indemnities without just cause in case of withdrawal from the contractual relationship, if the conditions in the previous paragraph are not met. In particular, when:
The timing to formalize the termination of the relationship is essential. Even in cases of serious default of the agent, the principal is not allowed to terminate the relationship without any formality. On the contrary, it is necessary for, concurrently with the above, the principal to expressly communicate the reasons for which it wants to terminate the relationship, specifically listing the breaches committed by the agent and their seriousness.
The agent retains the right to receive commissions for business concluded after the termination of the agency, provided that:
It’s often the case that the agency contract contains clauses which require the agent to reach minimum sales targets. Such a clause, together with the express termination clause, assuming that the parties have considered the failure to meet the established sales targets as particularly serious breach, should – at least in theory – result in the loss of the right of the agent to receive the payment of termination indemnities.
However, it is important to emphasize that the recent case law on agency contracts has taken a particularly cautious attitude towards agents. According to the mentioned case law, it should be appropriate, even in the presence of an express termination clause, to assess the seriousness of the breach, for example by verifying whether, in concrete terms, the difference between the result achieved by the agent and the sales target could qualify as a breach so serious as to prevent the continuation of the relationship even on a temporary basis.
Fashion, Beauty and Luxury
Daniela Della Rosa
+39 02 7623 2001
News 18 May. 2023
Francesco Sorace has published an article on “Enforcing an ICSID Award Issued in an Intra-EU Investment Arbitration: An Italian Law Perspective"
News 11 May. 2023
Curtis Italy Dispute Resolution Team Awarded