Event 14 Jun. 2022
Antonia Birt to Speak on Importance of Going Paperless in Arbitration Proceedings at Upcoming Webinar
more
Event 02 Jun. 2022
Borzu Sabahi Lectures to Government Officials from Ghana and Kenya
Client Alert 29 Jun. 2022
Discovery, Jurisdiction and Service: Changes in U.S. Law and Implications for Japanese Companies
Client Alert 24 Feb. 2022
EU, UK, Japan and Australia Impose Sanctions on Russia
News 05 Jul. 2022
Sebastiano Nessi Joins Curtis’ International Disputes Practice as Partner in Geneva
Publications 30 Jun. 2022
Lise Johnson’s Submission to the OECD's Public Consultation on Investment Treaties and Climate Change
Event 08 Jun. 2022
Partner Fernando Tupa Speaks at Instituto Peruano de Arbitraje’s Second International Conference on Arbitration and Energy
Claudia Frutos-Peterson Speaks at the 13th Latin American Arbitration Conference (CLA)
Dubai Partner Antonia Birt to Moderate Panel on Hybrid Legal Cultures in International Arbitration
News 01 Jul. 2022
Partner Charles Howland Quoted in Spotlight PA Article on PFAS Groundwater Contamination
Client Alert 30 Jun. 2022
U.S. President Biden Issues Eighth Tranche of Economic Sanctions
Client Alert 28 Jun. 2022
U.S. President Biden Raises Tariffs on Russian Imports
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
News 16 May. 2022
Click here to download the full press release
Acting as pro bono counsel, Curtis filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the Ohio Justice & Policy Center (OJPC) in support of granting the petition for certiorari in Gray v. White, No. 21-1362, a case involving a prisoner’s right to assert a claim for excessive force by prison guards in connection with a disciplinary violation.
“OJPC does important work ensuring that basic constitutional rights are enforced, and we are honored to assist OJPC in presenting its views to the Supreme Court on these important issues,” said Curtis partner Juan Perla, who led the Curtis appellate team on this pro bono matter. Other members of the team included partners Barry Kingham and Robert Garcia, and associates Nathaniel Ament-Stone and Aubre Dean.
The case was brought by a prisoner in Louisiana, who alleges that prison guards attacked him without provocation, sprayed him with a chemical agent, and beat him severely, causing injuries including a broken nose and a bruised kidney. He filed a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, asserting claims for excessive force in violation of his constitutional rights including the right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. As a defense, the guards relied on a prison board’s findings that some of the alleged conduct was provoked and was a response to a disciplinary violation by the petitioner. That determination resulted in the revocation of the petitioner’s good-time credit, which had the effect of extending his term of confinement. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled that excessive-force claims may be barred by the Supreme Court’s decision in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994), which forecloses the use of Section 1983 as a means of indirectly attacking the validity of a prisoner’s conviction or sentence. The Fifth Circuit remanded to the district court for a “fact-specific analysis” as to whether the petitioner’s claims are Heck barred.
Michael Zuckerman, a law professor at The Ohio State University’s Moritz College of Law and litigation counsel at OJPC, stated: “Prisoners seeking to vindicate their constitutional rights face extraordinary legal hurdles already. The Heck bar has its purposes when it comes to challenging convictions and sentences, but broadening Heck’s reach to cover conditions-of-confinement claims is a misguided expansion of the doctrine. We at OJPC are grateful to the excellent team at Curtis for helping stand up for Section 1983 and the constitutional rights of incarcerated people across the country.”
Appellate Litigation
Juan Perla
Partner
T. Barry Kingham
Robert B. García
Nathaniel Ament-Stone
Associate
New York
+1 212 696 6000
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.