Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 09 Sep. 2022
France’s Cour de Cassation Confirms Set Aside of EUR 452 Million Award Previously Issued Against Libya
Client Alert 20 Sep. 2022
Unexpected Events from Covid to Supply Chain Disruption: Implications for US Contract, Securities and Antitrust Law
Client Alert 29 Jun. 2022
Discovery, Jurisdiction and Service: Changes in U.S. Law and Implications for Japanese Companies
News 28 Sep. 2022
Simon Batifort Quoted by GAR on Proposed Regulations of Third-Party Funding in Europe
Client Alert 27 Sep. 2022
UNCITRAL Working Group III: An Update on Certain Key Issues in ISDS Reform
News 23 Sep. 2022
Curtis Recognized by Latin Lawyer 250 (2023)
Event 22 Sep. 2022
Dori Yoldi Speaks to AbogadasMX on Practicing Law Abroad
News 27 Sep. 2022
Curtis Boosts Riyadh Office with New Corporate Partner Stuart Davies
News 16 Aug. 2022
Curtis Delivers More Firsts for the Government of Oman in its Defense Against U.S. Trade Measures
News 30 Sep. 2022
Jason Wright Wins Small Company Turnaround/Transaction Award at TMA Annual Conference
News 21 Sep. 2022
U.S. Department of State Presents Fulbright Specialist Award to Charles Howland for Project in Uzbekistan
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 20 Jul. 2022
The EU Undertakes Fundamental Reform of the Legal Basis for Sanctions Enforcement
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Publications May 2008
Regulatory agencies are paying much closer attention to Sovereign Wealth Funds as they continue to make headlines. Concern among potential recipient countries is being raised by the increasing international investment activity of Sovereign Wealth Funds with excess liquidity.
U.S. Committee on Foreign Investments
On April 21st, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued proposed regulations for the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States ('CFIUS') in response to the recent increase in activity of Sovereign Wealth Funds. More recently,on May 2nd, the Treasury held a public meeting to solicit comments on the proposed regulations. The Treasury is also accepting final written comments until June 9th, 2008.
The Treasury's proposed regulations are an attempt to sharpen the mandate of CFIUS, following on the passage of the Foreign Investment and National Security Act of 2007 ('FINSA'). FINSA allows for more specific rules regarding the oversight and approval of foreign investment in the United States. FINSA provides authority for the President and, as a result, CFIUS as an executive committee, to 'review mergers, acquisitions, and takeovers by or with any foreign person which could result in foreign control of any person engaged in interstate commerce in the United States, to determine the effects of such transactions on the national security of the United States.'
Greater Discretion to Determine Control
The proposed regulations specifically address two main issues relating to CFIUS review: what types of transactions are covered, and what the proper definition of 'control' is for purposes of the review.
According to the proposed regulations, a transaction would be defined as a 'merger, acquisition, or takeover' whether proposed or already completed. In contrast, the proposed regulations define 'control' rather vaguely, as the direct or indirect power to determine or decide important matters affecting a company. Under this definition, CFIUS purports to consider all relevant factors in order to evaluate whether a foreign entity can determine or decide such important matters.
Who Should Be Concerned?
The public meeting initiated important discussions regarding potential issues with the proposed regulations. Of particular concern to Sovereign Wealth Funds is the lack of clarity regarding who must submit a transaction for CFIUS review, particularly when Sovereign Wealth Funds act as limited partners or members to domestic collective investment vehicles. Further, the lack of regulation regarding confidentiality and coordination with other branches of the government risks the possibility of disclosure of confidential information to Congress and potentially throughout the public at large.
IMF Best Practices Initiative
The Treasury regulations were issued after a flurry of activity by the International Monetary Fund ('IMF'). In October 2007, the IMF participated in a discussion with various U.S. Government officials as well as the heads of several Sovereign Wealth Funds, including China, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Singapore and the United Arab Emirates. The IMF, following this discussion, was given the task of identifying and clarifying a set of best-practices for Sovereign Wealth Funds.
The IMF hopes to issue final guidelines in October 2008 though no specific guidelines have yet been finalized. The IMF has released a Working Agenda for Sovereign Wealth Funds that discusses the most salient issues such as increased transparency, stronger corporate governance, and the importance of clearly established legal frameworks and structures.
Carl A. Ruggiero