Event 14 Oct. 2022
Curtis Provides Capacity Training to the Government of Uganda
Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 15 May. 2023
Curtis represents e-commerce retailer in its fight to recover monies withheld by PayPal, the global payment giant
News 16 Dec. 2022
Curtis Trade Team is top ranked in Chambers Asia-Pacific 2023
Event 08 May. 2023
Partner Irene Petrelli to Participate in ICC YAAF Event
News 02 May. 2023
Curtis Italy with DeA Capital in the Acquisition of Magic S.r.l
Event 23 May. 2023
Partners Luciana Ricart and Fernando Tupa Will Teach a Workshop on Hearings in Investment Arbitration for Arbanza School of Arbitration’s Online Program
Publications 23 Feb. 2023
Fernando Tupa Publishes Book on Forum-Specific Consent to International Arbitration in Investment Agreements
Event 03 May. 2023
Dr. Borzu Sabahi to Speak at ICSID-ADGM Joint Conference: Investment Protection and Armed Conflict
Event 19 Mar. 2023
Sebastiano Nessi speaks at Bahrain Business and Legal Landscape Conference
Event 01 Jun. 2023
Curtis Environmental Chair Charles Howland to Moderate Panel Discussion on Latest Developments in Environmental Due Diligence at ABA Masterclass on Environmental Transactions
News 25 May. 2023
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Distinguished Law Professors in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Case
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Client Alert 24 Nov. 2020
The alert is available for download here.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued further guidance on the non-deductibility of covered expenses (generally, payroll, rent, and utilities) if the payment of those expenses results in the forgiveness of a loan granted under the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). In late April, the IRS issued Notice 2020-32 in which it announced that no deduction is allowed under the Internal Revenue Code (Code) for an expense that is otherwise deductible if the payment of the expense results in forgiveness of a covered loan pursuant to Section 1106(b) of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and the income associated with the forgiveness is excluded from gross income for purposes of the Code pursuant to Section 1106(i) of the CARES Act.
Businesses suffering under the strain of the pandemic were hoping that IRS guidance would grant relief from the non-deductibility policy of the IRS. Instead, the IRS reaffirmed its position by issuing Revenue Ruling 2020-27, in which it rules that covered expenses are not deductible in 2020 to a taxpayer that met all requirements and applied for loan forgiveness in 2020 even if the taxpayer is not informed in 2020 whether the loan would be forgiven. The IRS further ruled that covered expenses are not deductible in 2020 to a taxpayer that similarly has met all requirements for loan forgiveness in 2020, but does not apply for loan forgiveness until 2021. Essentially, the IRS clarified that the timing of the application for the loan forgiveness has no effect on the deductibility of the covered expenses for federal income tax purposes. The upshot is that taxpayers should not delay the application for loan forgiveness, as such delay to 2021 does not make the otherwise non-deductible 2020 covered expenses deductible.
The IRS did, however, provide relief under Revenue Procedure 2020-51, to those taxpayers who forego or are denied forgiveness of debt under the PPP. Even if a taxpayer expects at the end of 2020 that the PPP loan would be forgiven in 2021, such taxpayer can claim a safe-harbor deduction, in a taxable year beginning or ending in 2020, for covered expenses paid or accrued in 2020 if the taxpayer’s request for forgiveness of the covered loan is denied, in whole or in part, or the taxpayer decides never to request forgiveness of the covered loan. A taxpayer may be able to deduct some or all of the eligible expenses on the taxpayer’s timely filed, including extensions, original income tax return or information return, as applicable, for the 2020 taxable year, or an amended return or an administrative adjustment request under Section 6227 of the Code for the 2020 taxable year, as applicable; or the taxpayer’s timely filed, including extensions, original income tax return or information return, as applicable, for the subsequent taxable year.
It should be noted that the IRS’ position on the non-deductibility of covered expenses is not uncontroversial. Immediately after the IRS’ issuance of Revenue Ruling 2020-27, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) released a joint statement that provides that Congressional intent was for the payment of covered expenses to be deductible. In addition, Senators Grassley and Wyden have asked that the IRS reconsider its position on the non-deductibility of covered expenses. It is possible that Congressional action may overrule the policy position of the IRS, but that remains to be seen.
Attorney advertising. The material contained in this Client Alert is only a general review of the subjects covered and does not constitute legal advice. No legal or business decision should be based on its contents.
Marco A. Blanco
Olga R. Beloded
+1 212 696 6000
+41 22 718 3500
+33 1 42 68 72 00
Article 24 May. 2023
Elisa Botero, Belén Ibañez and Sara Dangón Publish Article in Law360 on the U.N General Assembly’s Request to the ICJ for an Advisory Opinion on State Obligations on Climate Change