Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 09 Sep. 2022
France’s Cour de Cassation Confirms Set Aside of EUR 452 Million Award Previously Issued Against Libya
Client Alert 20 Sep. 2022
Unexpected Events from Covid to Supply Chain Disruption: Implications for US Contract, Securities and Antitrust Law
Client Alert 29 Jun. 2022
Discovery, Jurisdiction and Service: Changes in U.S. Law and Implications for Japanese Companies
News 28 Sep. 2022
Simon Batifort Quoted by GAR on Proposed Regulations of Third-Party Funding in Europe
Client Alert 27 Sep. 2022
UNCITRAL Working Group III: An Update on Certain Key Issues in ISDS Reform
News 23 Sep. 2022
Curtis Recognized by Latin Lawyer 250 (2023)
Event 22 Sep. 2022
Dori Yoldi Speaks to AbogadasMX on Practicing Law Abroad
News 27 Sep. 2022
Curtis Boosts Riyadh Office with New Corporate Partner Stuart Davies
News 16 Aug. 2022
Curtis Delivers More Firsts for the Government of Oman in its Defense Against U.S. Trade Measures
News 30 Sep. 2022
Jason Wright Wins Small Company Turnaround/Transaction Award at TMA Annual Conference
News 21 Sep. 2022
U.S. Department of State Presents Fulbright Specialist Award to Charles Howland for Project in Uzbekistan
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 20 Jul. 2022
The EU Undertakes Fundamental Reform of the Legal Basis for Sanctions Enforcement
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
The World Trade Organization settles international trade disputes with a multi-step process outlined in the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) agreed to by member nations in 1994. The process includes various stages of consultation between the member nations, the formation of an ad hoc Dispute Settlement Panel, examination of the member nations and third parties by the panel, the issuance of a report, and, if necessary, authorized compensatory or retaliatory measures.
Insofar as the purpose of WTO trade law is to preserve the rights of WTO member nations and to provide predictability and uniformity to the resolution of WTO trade disputes, the dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization could reasonably be said to serve its purpose. Of course, there are examples of disputes between member nations that have not been satisfactorily resolved by the WTO.
WTO decisions are enforced by consensus. The WTO itself holds no leverage over the member nations and relies on its members to enforce sanctions, retaliatory measures, and compensatory measures. Unlike some agencies, whose bureaucracies can threaten to withhold credit to an offending nation, WTO trade law is entirely consensus-based.
The World Trade Organization hears allegations of violations of its trade agreements via its Dispute Settlement Body. Decisions of and reports by the DSB must be enforced by member nations, who have previously agreed to the DIspute Settlement Understanding which requires a multilateral approach to dispute resolution. The WTO has no authority or leverage to unilaterally impose resolutions of international trade disputes.
The WTO dispute process begins with a consultation period, during which the affected member nations engage in negotiation and mediation. If consultation is unsuccessful, each party is examined by an ad hoc dispute resolution panel made up of three or five members. The panel prepares a report and provides it to the involved parties. The unsuccessful party submits an implementation report to the panel. If implementation is unsatisfactory, the successful party may be authorized to take retaliatory measures.
A trade dispute can refer to a wide variety of situations, from a full-scale “customs war” or “trade war” to a less intense conflict about the alleged violation of a trade agreement, custom, or rule by one of a country’s trading partners. International trade disputes often involve allegations of dumping or abusive national subsidy practices.
The dispute settlement mechanism is a crucial part of WTO trade law. When an international trade dispute occurs, the World Trade Organization encourages consultation between the affected parties to resolve the dispute. When no resolution is forthcoming, the World Trade Organization convenes an ad hoc dispute settlement panel to examine each of the parties and any involved third parties. The panel prepares a report, the recommendations of which must be implemented by the unsuccessful party.
Trade disputes can be handled in a variety of ways. The majority are dealt with by way of informal and formal negotiations between nations. Those that require further adjudication often go before the Dispute Settlements Body at the World Trade Organization. International trade disputes that require this level of formal resolution move through different levels of consultation, litigation, and adjudication.
WTO and International Trade Dispute Settlement
+1 202 452 7373
+86 10 8564 6200
+32 2 313 37 31
+41 22 718 3500