Event 14 Oct. 2022
Curtis Provides Capacity Training to the Government of Uganda
more
Event 21 Sep. 2022
Kalidou Gadio Speaks at AIEN 2022 International Energy Summit
News 15 May. 2023
Curtis represents e-commerce retailer in its fight to recover monies withheld by PayPal, the global payment giant
News 16 Dec. 2022
Curtis Trade Team is top ranked in Chambers Asia-Pacific 2023
Event 08 May. 2023
Partner Irene Petrelli to Participate in ICC YAAF Event
News 02 May. 2023
Curtis Italy with DeA Capital in the Acquisition of Magic S.r.l
Event 23 May. 2023
Partners Luciana Ricart and Fernando Tupa Will Teach a Workshop on Hearings in Investment Arbitration for Arbanza School of Arbitration’s Online Program
Publications 23 Feb. 2023
Fernando Tupa Publishes Book on Forum-Specific Consent to International Arbitration in Investment Agreements
Event 03 May. 2023
Dr. Borzu Sabahi to Speak at ICSID-ADGM Joint Conference: Investment Protection and Armed Conflict
News 27 Sep. 2022
Curtis Boosts Riyadh Office with New Corporate Partner Stuart Davies
News 25 May. 2023
Curtis Files SCOTUS Amicus Brief for Distinguished Law Professors in First Amendment Retaliatory Arrest Case
News 06 Mar. 2023
Russia Sanctions at the First Anniversary: An Overview of Current Sanctions in the US, UK, and EU and How Global Companies Can Navigate Evolving and Conflicting Sanctions Regimes
Client Alert 30 Aug. 2022
The EU Adopts the “Maintenance and Alignment” Sanctions Package
Client Alert 24 Jun. 2021
Update on Virtual Notarization (Executive Order 202.7) During the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
Update on Virtual Witnessing (New York Executive Order 202.14) During The COVID-19 (Coronavirus) Pandemic (Updated: June 24, 2021) — U.S. Insight
International Trade
The World Trade Organization settles international trade disputes with a multi-step process outlined in the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) agreed to by member nations in 1994. The process includes various stages of consultation between the member nations, the formation of an ad hoc Dispute Settlement Panel, examination of the member nations and third parties by the panel, the issuance of a report, and, if necessary, authorized compensatory or retaliatory measures.
Insofar as the purpose of WTO trade law is to preserve the rights of WTO member nations and to provide predictability and uniformity to the resolution of WTO trade disputes, the dispute settlement mechanism of the World Trade Organization could reasonably be said to serve its purpose. Of course, there are examples of disputes between member nations that have not been satisfactorily resolved by the WTO.
WTO decisions are enforced by consensus. The WTO itself holds no leverage over the member nations and relies on its members to enforce sanctions, retaliatory measures, and compensatory measures. Unlike some agencies, whose bureaucracies can threaten to withhold credit to an offending nation, WTO trade law is entirely consensus-based.
The World Trade Organization hears allegations of violations of its trade agreements via its Dispute Settlement Body. Decisions of and reports by the DSB must be enforced by member nations, who have previously agreed to the DIspute Settlement Understanding which requires a multilateral approach to dispute resolution. The WTO has no authority or leverage to unilaterally impose resolutions of international trade disputes.
The WTO dispute process begins with a consultation period, during which the affected member nations engage in negotiation and mediation. If consultation is unsuccessful, each party is examined by an ad hoc dispute resolution panel made up of three or five members. The panel prepares a report and provides it to the involved parties. The unsuccessful party submits an implementation report to the panel. If implementation is unsatisfactory, the successful party may be authorized to take retaliatory measures.
A trade dispute can refer to a wide variety of situations, from a full-scale “customs war” or “trade war” to a less intense conflict about the alleged violation of a trade agreement, custom, or rule by one of a country’s trading partners. International trade disputes often involve allegations of dumping or abusive national subsidy practices.
The dispute settlement mechanism is a crucial part of WTO trade law. When an international trade dispute occurs, the World Trade Organization encourages consultation between the affected parties to resolve the dispute. When no resolution is forthcoming, the World Trade Organization convenes an ad hoc dispute settlement panel to examine each of the parties and any involved third parties. The panel prepares a report, the recommendations of which must be implemented by the unsuccessful party.
Trade disputes can be handled in a variety of ways. The majority are dealt with by way of informal and formal negotiations between nations. Those that require further adjudication often go before the Dispute Settlements Body at the World Trade Organization. International trade disputes that require this level of formal resolution move through different levels of consultation, litigation, and adjudication.
Daniel Porter
Partner
WTO and International Trade Dispute Settlement
Washington, D.C.
+1 202 452 7373
Beijing
+86 10 8564 6200
Brussels
+32 2 313 37 31
Geneva
+41 22 718 3500
We use cookies on our website to enhance your browsing experience, match your interests and assess our website performance. We do not share information with any third-party for marketing purposes. Please view our privacy policy to learn more about the use of cookies on our website. By continuing to browse our website, you consent to our use of cookies.